How long will you stay at that new job?
Co-workers may be helping you make that decision, says UC researcher
Why do new employees leave a company?
It may have something to do with the group of workers — also known as their cohort — who were hired and trained around the same time for a job, explains a University of Cincinnati researcher.
“Cohorts are more than just a collection of individuals,” says Daniel Peat, PhD, assistant professor in UC’s Carl H. Lindner College of Business and a study co-author. “They actually have their own social interactions. You have to manage the cohort as a social group. It can have a really strong effect on an organization.”
Law firms, police departments, the military and some Fortune 500 companies like Amazon hire cohorts who are usually trained together.
Peat is a co-author of a new study published in the Journal of General Management that looks at the role workplace cohorts may have on new employee retention and turnover. Understanding that interplay may assist companies in finding ways to reduce new employee turnover.
Daniel Peat, PhD, in the Lindner College of Business. Photo/Andrew Higley/UC Marketing + Brand.
The study analyzed survey data from 656 graduate trainees in 32 cohorts at global information technology services firm. It found that new employees close to their cohort are more likely to be influenced by them and would consider a new job search if the cohort decided to search for a job. However, the cohort’s impact is mitigated if the employee prefers their organization’s geographic location.
The study’s principal investigator is Amit Chauradia, PhD, assistant professor at the University of South Florida’s Muma College of Business, and its first author is Koustab Ghosh, PhD, associate professor at the Indian Institute of Management Rohtak, Haryana, India.
“We all want to reduce turnover, that’s the biggest problem organizations face,” explains Chauradia.
He says that if a new employee really prefers their current location it reduces the impact that the cohort will have on turnover. “So for example, if I want to be in Cincinnati, then whatever the core does impacts me a little, but not as much,” says Chauradia.
UC’s Peat says their study findings build off discussions on social contagion effects of turnover, but charts new ground in focusing on the impact of cohorts on job behavior. He adds that a focus on work location is part of a growing national conversation as more companies ask workers to return to in-office activities.
“So with these return-to-office requirements you can’t just live anywhere,” says Peat. “You have to live locationally bound somewhat to an office.”
Featured top image of a group of employees celebrating a job well done. Photo/Istock.
A company welcomes a batch of new employees. Photo/Istock.
Impact Lives Here
The University of Cincinnati is leading public urban universities into a new era of innovation and impact. Our faculty, staff and students are saving lives, changing outcomes and bending the future in our city's direction. Next Lives Here.
Related Stories
Lindner graduate students shine in international simulation competition
November 10, 2025
Five master’s of information systems (MS IS) students took home fifth place out of 23 universities at the International ERPsim Competition hosted by HEC Montreal during the recent spring semester. The competition tests students’ knowledge of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software and their ability to adapt to challenging business problems.
Sugar overload killing hearts
November 10, 2025
Two in five people will be told they have diabetes during their lifetime. And people who have diabetes are twice as likely to develop heart disease. One of the deadliest dangers? Diabetic cardiomyopathy. But groundbreaking University of Cincinnati research hopes to stop and even reverse the damage before it’s too late.
Is going nuclear the solution to Ohio’s energy costs?
November 10, 2025
The Ohio Capital Journal recently reported that as energy prices continue to climb, economists are weighing the benefits of going nuclear to curb costs. The publication dove into a Scioto Analysis survey of 18 economists to weigh the pros and cons of nuclear energy. One economist featured was Iryna Topolyan, PhD, professor of economics at the Carl H. Lindner College of Business.