Exploring the current use and future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials
MSN highlights editorial authored by UC experts
MSN highlighted an editorial written by the University of Cincinnati’s Yasmin Aziz, MD, and Joseph Broderick, MD, published Nov. 7 in the journal Neurology analyzing the current use and potential future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials.
Patient informed consent is a crucial part of ethical clinical trial design and implementation, but time is of the essence for stroke trials. Approximately 2 million neurons die each minute they are deprived of oxygen, and patients are also sometimes incapacitated and therefore unable to consent to a trial, highlighting the need for emergency consent in certain cases.
There is currently no worldwide standard for emergency consent for stroke trials, with various approaches taken by different countries.
“This editorial is intended to educate the greater neurology community about these consent procedures and their current relevance to stroke research in particular,” said Aziz, assistant professor in the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine in UC’s College of Medicine and a UC Health physician.
Broderick is principal investigator of the FASTEST trial, the first acute stroke trial in the United States to use exception from informed consent (EFIC) protocols.
“...Community consultation and public disclosure are unique to EFIC,” the authors wrote. “Both requirements can be quite expensive and time-consuming, delaying study start-up. Efforts to make EFIC more efficient and less costly in the US are ongoing.”
The coauthors noted as the field continues to explore the most effective and efficient alternatives to prospective informed consent, the “principles of patient autonomy and beneficence remain imperative.” Aziz said improving consent procedures is an opportunity to “keep moving the chains forward” for stroke research.
“The United States in particular has a very dark, very recent, unethical history with certain populations and the performance of clinical research,” she said. “We need to find the best way to honor patient autonomy while moving research forward to ultimately get better treatments to the bedside.”
Neuro Rehab Times also covered the editorial. Read the Neuro Rehab Times article.
Featured photo at top of brain scans. Photo courtesy of Joseph Broderick.
Related Stories
Sugar overload killing hearts
November 10, 2025
Two in five people will be told they have diabetes during their lifetime. And people who have diabetes are twice as likely to develop heart disease. One of the deadliest dangers? Diabetic cardiomyopathy. But groundbreaking University of Cincinnati research hopes to stop and even reverse the damage before it’s too late.
Is going nuclear the solution to Ohio’s energy costs?
November 10, 2025
The Ohio Capital Journal recently reported that as energy prices continue to climb, economists are weighing the benefits of going nuclear to curb costs. The publication dove into a Scioto Analysis survey of 18 economists to weigh the pros and cons of nuclear energy. One economist featured was Iryna Topolyan, PhD, professor of economics at the Carl H. Lindner College of Business.
App turns smartwatch into detector of structural heart disease
November 10, 2025
An app that uses an AI model to read a single-lead ECG from a smartwatch can detect structural heart disease, researchers reported at the 2025 Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association. Although the technology requires further validation, researchers said it could help improve the identification of patients with heart failure, valvular conditions and left ventricular hypertrophy before they become symptomatic, which could improve the prognosis for people with these conditions.